what does this MEAN?

[Clifford Black]

Who was this man talking about?

                                 ‎"I teach you the Superman. Man is something to be surpassed." --- Friedrich Nietzsche

[Clifford Black]

@HAWK-as DC transmitted, roger that-and-I GROK....(B).

[Dominique Christina]

Ha! I should admit that I have no fucking idea where the phrase "Roger that" came from. Have no idea who Roger is or what it is a reference to...one mo thang to consider.

[Clifford Black]

@DC, If u would consider using the term fec when ever u communicate in colloquial verbiage/not that I care but we are hosting a number of children and I want them to practise with how they use the language---Peace God!!!

(B).

P.S. Look up fecundate. The word is not a bad word---but there are some things that we first have to teach our children about words and language before we can allow ourselves to relax regarding how we speak.

 

[Dominique Christina]

Ah. I am familiar with fecundate. Gotcha. I shall not spew again....at least not in the same fashion.

[Clifford Black]

Lord Knows I am thinking forward---Just got to hold on!!!!!!!

(B).

[Aaron (Al) Lewis]

Dominique, Roger was a military term meaning "I have Received your transmission". Roger was a phonetic alphabet during WW 2. 

 

Mann

[Clifford Black]

Now that is a utilization of a particular learning process and I hope all will take full advantage of those times when it can be done with harmony and balance.

(B).

[Dominique Christina]

Good stuff. I am revisiting Nietzsche now....and I dig him. He said, "I have never pondered over questions that are not questions. I have never squandered my strength. Of actual religious difficulties I have no experience. I have never known what it is to feel 'sinful'."....I like it....

[Aaron (Al) Lewis]

In order to learn who I am I had to first learn who and what I am not. Every label I accepted and that I didn't create myself with the understanding of being, diminished my capacity to be. It became one of hundreds of distractions. The story would place in my path as bait to draw me down useless and feckless tributaries to nowhere.  By story I mean the story that was created thousands of years ago and that has evolved over the millennium to structure the masses into cohesive energy groups (CEGs) designed to replicate itself.

The  Masses of Human Protoplasm (MHP) simply have served as energy sources to feed the story and keep in great and magnificent comfort those on top of the social pyramid and their major and minor functionaries in relative comfort. In effect the story is so ingrained into most of our psyches that most never even question it and will become the minion functionaries that actually keep this damnable story alive and intact in our own minds making it a reality for all.

 

One must respect its (the story) genius and will to survive and thrive and its tellers tenacity to memorialize and evolve the story to present time. However the story has a fatal flaw. Even it cannot defy the universal law of inflation and deflation. So as it has risen so must it collapse. The big issue with that is those in it with the least power suffer the greatest when it falls. Just study history and you will see that it has happened over and over. Only this time with a global instantaneous economy fueled by instantaneous communication when it happens it affects 7 billion MHP!

 

What Neitsche was suggesting was that man can rise above that. What Joel A. Rogers suggested was that man, especially men of color, were brought down from already doing it.

[Clifford Black]

@Al---Almost there/here and might I say that there are those who need the company!!!! B.

[Dominique Christina]

Man is something to be surpassed....I get that. The question then seems to become: What have we done to surpass him? What does that look like? Everywhere on the planet we see this process called evolution advance a species forward. Man's "evolution" should then be a process wherein he surpasses himself...that right?  I have to imagine that this idea is in fact the purpose of man. Whatever divine rights he has on the planet must be centered in this. (This is where I am so far....) 

[Aaron (Al) Lewis]

D, what determines if what we have witnessed in our life time and historically is evolution?  As Rogers suggests it is de-volution. I tend to agree with him. Like Mr. Franklin I am not too impressed with humans and certainly not impressed with their creation called civilization. 

 

A